Council
A council of the best models — grounded in your brain

One model guesses.
A council decides.

A single LLM gives you one reasoning path dressed up as confidence. Council convenes the world's best models — Claude, GPT, Gemini, DeepSeek and more — to debate your question over two rounds, cross-examine each other, and hand you a chairman's verdict with a confidence-weighted vote and the disagreement laid bare.

6+ model families, one verdictA verdict in ≈40 secondsFailed models auto-refunded
ClaudeGPTGeminiDeepSeekLlamaMistral
Chairman's verdict

The council splits 4–2: ship the patch now, but scope the rewrite this quarter — the risk isn't the code, it's the deadline.

Patch now, rewrite laterweight 9/11
Rewrite immediatelyweight 4/11
Agrees: the patch is safe
Open: who owns the rewrite?
How it works

From one question to a reasoned verdict, in three steps.

1

Ask your hardest question

Type a real decision or open question. Optionally ground it in your own Ounie brains — the council reasons over your notes, docs, and transcripts and cites the exact pages it used. No brain? It reasons from first principles.

2

The council deliberates

A panel of different model families — Claude, GPT, Gemini, DeepSeek and more — each analyzes blind, then cross-examines the others' arguments anonymously, so no one just defers to the smartest-looking model. Genuine disagreement is the point.

3

The chairman delivers a verdict

A separate synthesizer model weighs the arguments — not the loudest voice — into a verdict: what the council agrees on, what stays unresolved, the core disagreement, a confidence-weighted vote, and next steps. Keep it, share it, or re-open it.

What you get

Structured disagreement, not one confident answer.

Each seat is a genuinely different model, so the council disagrees on substance, not tone. Round one is blind; round two is anonymized cross-examination — a model updates only when a peer names a real flaw, never just to conform. Then a separate chairman weighs the arguments and hands you the verdict with the vote and the open questions intact.

2
Rounds of debate
≈40s
To a verdict
1
Chairman synthesis
$0
To view or share
6+ distinct model families
Anonymized cross-examination
Confidence-weighted vote
Chairman synthesis
Grounded in YOUR brains
Verdicts cite their sources
Blend up to 5 brains
Disagreement surfaced, not hidden
No invented citations
Failed models auto-refunded
Shareable public verdicts
Pay per seat, keep every verdict
Use cases

Anywhere one opinion isn't enough.

When the question is hard, a single model's confidence is the trap. A council gives you the argument.

Hard engineering calls

Rewrite or patch? Monolith or split? Ground the council in your architecture brain and let Claude, GPT, and Gemini argue the trade-offs — then read the disagreement, not one model's confident hand-wave.

grounded in your docs

Strategy & bets

Pricing changes, market entries, big directional bets. A council surfaces the assumptions each model is smuggling in, and the confidence-weighted vote tells you how contested the call really is.

assumptions surfaced

Design & product reviews

Put a spec or a design in front of the council and get six independent critiques that then argue with each other — the strongest objections survive cross-examination, the weak ones get dropped.

critiques that debate

Risk & red-teaming

Ask what could go wrong. Diverse models catch failure modes a single one misses, and the chairman leads with the unresolved risks instead of a reassuring summary.

leads with unknowns

Ethics & judgment calls

Questions with no clean answer are exactly where one model's bias hides. A council with genuinely different training gives you the tension between positions, not a false consensus.

tension, not consensus

Second opinions on anything

Any time you'd want a room of smart, disagreeing advisors — a contract clause, a research direction, a tricky email — convene one in forty seconds and share the verdict with a link.

shareable verdict
For developers & AI agents

Convene a council over REST or MCP.

Every council is a REST endpoint and a native MCP tool. Point Claude, Cursor, or your Ounie AI Team at Council and it can put your hardest questions to a room of the best models — grounded in your Ounie brains and drawing your shared Ounie credits, never overdrawing. One Ounie master key works across every Ounie app.

MCPClaude · Cursor · Ounie AI Team
RESTBearer cnl_live_ key, JSON
Master keyounie_live_ grounds + cites your brains
x402Keyless USDC — no-brain councils only
council.ounie.com/api/mcp
// Connect from any MCP host (Claude, Cursor, the AI SDK)
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ounie-council": {
      "url": "https://council.ounie.com/api/mcp",
      "headers": { "Authorization": "Bearer cnl_live_…" }
    }
  }
}

// …or the Ounie AI Team — the key rides the URL:
//   https://council.ounie.com/api/mcp?api_key=ounie_live_…

// Tool call → convene_council
{ "prompt": "Should we raise now or wait two quarters?",
  "seat_count": 5, "tier": "premium",
  "brain_ids": ["…"] }   // ground + cite (master key)
→ { "verdict": { … }, "tally": [ … ],
    "survivor_count": 5, "credits_spent": 50 }
Pricing

Pay per seat. Failed models refunded.

A council draws your Ounie credits — the same wallet every Ounie product shares (1 credit = 1¢). You reserve a price per model seat plus a synthesis fee, and you're charged only for the models that actually deliberate. Viewing, sharing, and exporting a verdict is always free.

FAQ

The questions we get first.

A panel of genuinely different AI models — Claude, GPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, Llama, Mistral and more, all reached through OpenRouter. Each seat analyzes your question independently, then cross-examines the others' arguments anonymously over a second round. A separate chairman model, which never deliberates, synthesizes the final verdict. Diversity comes from the model family, not a persona costume.

Stop trusting one model. Convene the council.

Sign in with Ounie and put your next hard call to a room full of the best minds in AI.